Jump to content

Talk:UK singles chart

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Take My Breath Away (SuReal song)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Take My Breath Away (SuReal song). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 17#Take My Breath Away (SuReal song) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. (CC) Tbhotch™ 20:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Freak Mode" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Freak Mode. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 26#Freak Mode until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. ResPM (T🔈 🎵C) 12:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Video streams

[edit]

No mention of these being introduced in 2017 Coachtripfan (talk) 10:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 March 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus to move. Arguments against the proposal are based neither on evidence nor policy; the closest these arguments come is assertions that ngrams is not sufficient evidence, but in the absence of competing evidence I cannot give this argument much weight.

In comparison, the arguments for the proposal are based on MOS:CAPS and WP:NCCAPS, with ngrams given as evidence.

Note that there may be an argument that the policy is incorrect or not useful to readers - however, the place to assess whether this argument has weight is at an RfC on the PAGs, not here. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 03:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and 5 more with "UK Singles Chart" added late (18 March) based on discussion below:

– Lowercase is much more common in sources; and the official name is also not so common, so let's go with the commonname, lowercase, as sources do. Dicklyon (talk) 10:11, 12 March 2024 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 07:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BD2412 T 17:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose: I don't know... Even with Google Books, how can you be sure all the sources inspected are legit? Likewise, there are plenty of British sources that aren't on Google Books, like Music Week, Record Mirror, Smash Hits, etc. Even so, proper grammar in these kinds of periodicals tend to be loosey-goosey at best, so we can't really give them much weight no matter how reliable they are. Meanwhile, there are more articles formatted like this, notably Canadian Singles Chart and Irish Singles Chart. Are those official names or just improper capitalizations? Will this kind of change go over well with the readers? The UK Singles Chart is the UK's official music chart, so how would demoting it to sentence case look? It seems to imply that there's more than one official chart in the UK. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 11:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Nobody is claiming that "all the sources inspected are legit". These are summary statistics of what was found in books and magazines, some of which may be flaky or may refer to different subjects. It's best to actually sample the books and see if any significant number of such problems are apparent, e.g. with searches such as this. I've looked, and haven't seen much that would influence the conclusion that this term is not consistently capitalized in independent reliable sources, which is what MOS:CAPS tells us to look to. Dicklyon (talk) 20:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    So then what of the Canadian/Irish Singles Chart issue? ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 14:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Just checked. The book hits that cap those are almost all from "PediaPress" or by "Wikipedians". Limiting to 20th century, I see almost all lowercase. So yes, we need to fix those, too. We can probably just do it after a consensus here, or we can do another RM if anyone objects. Dicklyon (talk) 06:29, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Will wait for the further discussion but this is a doozy (are you sure you want to decapitalize the official and well-known music chart of England which has well over 1,000 views a day?). Just dropping by to point out that the pages need an RM alert at the top, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Bot was confused by dual headings. All good now. Dicklyon (talk) 20:26, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Re "to decapitalize the official and well-known music chart of England", no, that's not what we're suggesting; just want to decapitalize our descriptive article titles about it. Dicklyon (talk) 20:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I don't see the need for such a drastic change like this. Hotwiki (talk) 19:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Have you looked at MOS:CAPS and WP:NCCAPS, which give the reason for the proposed change? It's not drastic, just a minor style change. Dicklyon (talk) 20:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree with Hotwiki that this is a drastic change. When a proper name is decapitalized it removes the respect and place-in-society that the proper name bestows upon a topic. I usually point to the Civil Rights Movement when this "minor style change" reasoning is raised (the 1954-1968 Civil Rights Movement was lowercased when it was caught up in decapping the earlier civil rights movement articles, which were loosely termed movements while the 1954-1968 Civil Rights Movement was a definable dated event initiated, organized, and directed by the same small group of people associated with a few organizations). Proper names earn their status by describing or achieving their unique roles or place in society and history. "Is UK Singles Chart a proper name and not a generic name?" should be the question here. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Randy, if "respect and place-in-society" should be part of WP's criteria for using capital letters, you should propose that at WT:MOS or some such place. It's currently specifically not part of what guidelines say to cap (see MOS:SIGNIFCAPS). Dicklyon (talk) 22:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    IAR and common sense should apply in some cases. If a name or event is obviously a proper name then arguably it's a proper name, no matter what the n-grams tell us, which is where the Civil Rights Movement fits. That was an event on par with the Second World War and similar identifiable concentrated periods in terms of societal influence. I don't know if UK Singles Chart is a proper name or not, and that's all that counts. Noticed you've expanded this into one of the biggest RM's in memory. Do you have a bot attaching notices to all the pages or doing it by hand? Hopefully this expansion will get this a relisting, probably some time needed to sort this one out. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Randy, at how many of these discussions have you proposed WP:IAR? Do you just like to ignore rules? I do, too, sometimes, but for Wikipedia, that's not the way to a quality outcome. Dicklyon (talk) 10:18, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    IAR is a policy, not a guideline or an essay, so using it as often as it takes to improve or maintain Wikipedia is an honorable goal and major tool of the site (please note that I'm not suggesting it for this discussion). It encompasses commonsense, which of course is different for each person and specific to each use, yet has its place here. Most if not almost all editors shy from the policy and both question and demean its purpose, which is a strange way to react to such a central pillar of the project. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I have no problem with the policy, which says "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it." But that's an important "if"; the burden is on you to show how ignoring widely accepted guidelines leads to an improvement. That's never evident in your quests to capitalize all kinds of things that sources don't mostly cap. Dicklyon (talk) 11:10, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "never evident"? The uppercase discussion at United States Capitol rotunda alone belies that assertion. "Rotunda" is uppercased by the officials of the capitol and officially by one-third of the U.S. government, but was not moved because of both the rules you take as doctrine: foolish consistency and official name. Why does Wikipedia totally discount official names when it comes to casing? I understand many instances, but certainly not others, and since that "rule" is oddly in-place then it is a rule that should be scrutinized each time it is used (and might apply to this discussion as 'Official Singles Chart' seems to be the official name but per rules we have to ignore it rather than use commonsense and replace 'UK Singles Chart' with 'Official Singles Chart' in all instances). Randy Kryn (talk) 11:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support all but Official Classical Singles Chart: It seems clear that "UK Singles Chart" is not the title of a publication. Instead, it is a description of a subject, so it should not be capitalized. The title of the publication is "Official Singles Chart" (or "Official Singles Chart Top 100"), and this is uncontroversially acknowledged in the first sentence of the article. The provided statistics bear this out, showing the phrase "UK Singles Chart" is not consistently capitalized in sources. I see no real reason for the current title to be capitalized like it is – it seems to just be capitalization to convey significance, which Wikipedia does not do. Neither of the two people who said they oppose the renaming seem to really dispute this. However, "Official Classical Singles Chart" doesn't belong in the list. It is the only one in the list that does not contain the phrase "UK Singles Chart". "Official Classical Singles Chart" is the title of the relevant publication (see here and here and here). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree I should not have included that one. Maybe I can just take it out, since it's unsupported. Dicklyon (talk) 20:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose There are multiple UK music charts that track singles (e.g. classical, dance, downloads, indie, R&B, rock & metal, vinyl), so, for the sake of clarity, I think it's important that the the name of the chart is specified in the articles' titles, which would therefore lend themselves to title case capitalisation. If the community wishes to move the articles to completely different names (such as Official Singles Chart), then that's another matter entirely. Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 20:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "Official Singles Chart" or "Official Singles Chart (UK)" seems OK, but not "UK Singles Chart". —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    But that term is relatively new and uncommon, and the articles are generally scoped to the entire history of the UK singles chart, not just the latest Official Charts version. Dicklyon (talk) 21:48, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @A Thousand Doors: I don't find anything in MOS:CAPS or WP:AT that would support your concept of "lend themselves to title case capitalisation"; we explicitly do sentence case, not title case. Dicklyon (talk) 03:00, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dicklyon: From MOS:CAPS: "In English, proper names, which can be either single words or phrases, are typically capitalized." This chart is referred to by multiple proper names, and whatever the community decides its most common proper name is (whether that's the UK Singles Chart, the Official Singles Chart or something else), the name should be in titles of these articles, and it therefore should be capitalised. Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 13:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure, whatever the community decides. But that decision is supposed to be based on the guidelines, which give us an operational way to decide whether something is a proper name. The lead at MOS:CAPS says only words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in Wikipedia. Dicklyon (talk) 19:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dicklyon: How about if all the UK Singles Chart articles were instead moved to Official Singles Chart, then? The titles would be clear, precise, common, and capitalised by reliable sources (e.g., The Guardian, Guinness World Records, Billboard, BBC News). I've got no real issue with the articles being moved away from their current titles, but moving them to what everyone already agrees are descriptive names isn't going to serve our readers. Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 22:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Seems you are saying that the actual name of these pages (reminder, the new pages listed below still need page alerts about this RM) is Offical Singles Chart etc. Is this accurate and well sourced? More input from music editors would be helpful. Randy Kryn (talk) 00:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Official Singles Chart is a long way from the common name. Here again is what's in sources. Dicklyon (talk) 03:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Randy, I have no objection if you want to alert all those other pages or make them part of the RM. I don't think the multi-RM template can handle that many, so hard to do so automatically. Dicklyon (talk) 03:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    At WP:RM it says there is "no technical limit" on the number of page in a multi-page RM. I think I remember there used to be a limit, but there doesn't seem to be one anymore. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 03:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I remember when it was 30, and when it got increased. I never heard it was unlimited. Anyway, the list is too complicated. But I will attempt to add the half dozen or so with "UK Singles Chart" that were missed, hoping there are no objections. We can address the others later if this proposal succeeds. Dicklyon (talk) 09:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, I added 5, and the bot notified the pages. I'll add them in the list that got generated when the original template was expanded. And I'll put a note that they were added late. Dicklyon (talk) 10:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support all. There's absolutely nothing about a "singles chart" that warrants capping. Not only that, many sources don't cap it (see MOSCAPS. Tony (talk) 02:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support; not consistently capitalized in sources, and these are not proper names ("official" or otherwise), just descriptive terms. Some specific publications like Official Classical Singles Chart have proper names, but those are not the titles of these articles, and their scope is broader.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  01:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - As others have pointed out, there is no reason for it to be capitalized. It is not a proper name, just a descriptive one of the chart, and that capitalization could created confusion into thinking that it is a proper name. It should be in lowercase as proposed. aaronneallucas (talk) 03:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, or Replace with the proper name: Official Singles Chart. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    So just ignore WP:COMMONNAME policy? Dicklyon (talk) 10:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: I don't believe ngrams, and the lack of any meaningful context, accurate represents the capitalization usage. "UK Singles Chart" appears to be a proper name and, as such, I think we should preserve the capitalization that reflects that. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support no evidence of consistent capitalization—and that's the only thing that matters, policy wise. (t · c) buidhe 19:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. There is absolutely no rationale presented by those in opposition that would suggest the conditions for capitalising per MOS:CAPS is met here. It has emphatically been shown that if there is any proper name in town, then it's Official Singles Chart but the title is not that, and there's no reason to suspect that's the WP:COMMONNAME either. And "I don't believe ngrams"... really? Why not? We've been using them with great success for years. That's a non-argument that should be soundly rejected. Overall, it is crystal clear that our guidelines mandate the proposed title.  — Amakuru (talk) 14:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • relisting comment while there is no strong consensus yet for the original proposed list, more titles to be moved have been proposed in the sub-section below. pinging all the involved editors: @ResolutionsPerMinute, Hotwiki, Randy Kryn, BarrelProof, A Thousand Doors, Tony1, SMcCandlish, Aplucas0703, Hey man im josh, Buidhe, and Amakuru: —usernamekiran (talk) 07:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Still oppose. UK Singles Chart is a proper name just like Billboard Hot 100. Also making a move would affect thousands of Wikipedia articles for songs, artists, singles, discographies, albums, etc. Hotwiki (talk) 07:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Per Hotwiki, who is a longtime music editor and would know the territory. The example of Billboard Hot 100 seems apt. As for the list below one word: tags. If a tag has not been placed on a page during the main discussion that page should go through another RM or just be left as is. Randy Kryn (talk) 09:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Some of you keep making these "is a proper name" assertions, but you have no evidence presented in support of the notion. We already know that Official Singles Chart might qualify as a proper name in this particular context as a publication title, but it is not the title (or the main part of the title) of these articles. So, no, Billboard magazine's "Hot 100" is not an apt example of anything like this; it is a proper-named and trademarked publication (or sub-publication, rather), not a general descriptive term for charts published over time by different entities, like "UK singles chart", etc. In theory, someone could split these articles up into separated sub-series of articles by actual publication/publisher, but I strongly suspect that consensus would be to re-merge them back into combined articles with WP:NDESC titles, as we have now, because breaking them up that way would not serve the interests or more than the tiniest fraction of readers, the vast majority of whom have no idea who was publishing what chart at what time.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  10:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    With all the proposed changes made by Dickylon below, this has just moved way outside my comfort zone. I still oppose, and I still think this won't be a peaceful series of moves. With the way things are, countless articles will have to be copyedited to accommodate the decapitalization changes—something of bot-level magnitude. This may even require an RfC. Sorry, but something that drastic I just can't endorse, no matter what the supporters say. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 11:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Continued and strengthened support. The further discussion has made it even more clear that these are not the actual titles of publications. Rather, they are descriptions of topics and are not consistently capped this way in sources. Caps would be fine if the articles used the actual publication's titles. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The oppose rationales that I'm seeing don't have a strong basis in capitalization guidelines. Thus, I continue to support. (t · c) buidhe 18:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I still believe it's been demonstrated that those are considered proper names. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: I don't believe in de capping this former name of the UK Official Charts regardless of not being relevant now or former proper name. DanTheMusicMan2 (talk) 01:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Can you please clarify what you mean by "this former name"? I don't see any evidence that the "Official Singles Chart" was formerly named "UK Singles Chart", and I haven't noticed anyone else referring to this being a "former name". —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I was trying to quote the lead of this article The UK Singles Chart (currently titled the Official Singles Chart
    a name that has been heavily used as a title of the charts and is still used today in articles just not as a title, i just gave wrong name. DanTheMusicMan2 (talk) 12:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: This affects thousands of entries on hundreds of pages which are well established for years. If there was any confusion about the current capitalisation why hasn’t it arisen before? For a change of this scale to be made, I believe there has to be clear evidence that it improves the readability of the articles and this doesn’t. The argument that this is not a proper name is based on a misunderstanding of the historical evolution of The Charts from a period of competing charts (plural no cap) to one Official Chart. Whether or not you include the word Official is irrelevant to the fact that this is one specific named chart: The Charts (singular). We aren’t talking about charts produced by different bodies each week. It is necessary to understand the cultural significance of The Charts in the UK to appreciate how to represent them.
Btljs (talk) 22:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Singles chart is a descriptive name. Per Collins dictionary, proper nouns are ... arbitrarily used to denote a particular person, place, or thing without regard to any descriptive meaning the word or phrase may have ... The phrase singles chart is not inherently a proper noun as some might argue. It appears to be capitalised for emphasis but we don't do that per MOS:SIGNIFCAPS. While the official name Official Singles Chart might be capitalised as the title of a work, the evidence does not support this as the WP:COMMONNAME. Per the general provisions of MOS:CAPS (through WP:NCCAPS), evidence does not show that UK singles chart (etc) is consistently capped in sources. Cinderella157 (talk) 11:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Before OCC took over, the charts were titled 'UK Singles' and 'UK Albums'. The proposed change seems like a complete waste of time and effort. --Michig (talk) 11:45, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Well luckily for you, it's not your time or effort that will be wasted, because someone else will handle the heavy lifting of moving these pages... As for what the charts were called back in the day, that's a bit irrelevant. It's what happens today that matter for WP:COMMONNAME and MOS:CAPS, and the evidence says that this title is not treated as a proper name.  — Amakuru (talk) 22:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Are you suggesting "UK Singles chart"? In book stats, I can't see a time when US Singles was mostly capitalized. Dicklyon (talk) 04:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[edit]

It's pointed out above that we didn't get all the places where this might want fixing. I find these with "Singles Chart", and would invite comments on whether some of them should stay capitalized: Dicklyon (talk) 06:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Dicklyon, can you or a bot please notify these pages with an RM tag, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC))[reply]
Note that I added just 5, with "UK Singles Chart", to this RM, with automatic notification by the bot. The rest can be worked on later. Still seeking input here about them. Dicklyon (talk) 10:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. List of one-hit wonders on the UK Singles Chart
  2. Lists of UK Singles Chart number ones
  3. List of UK Singles Chart Christmas number ones
  4. List of UK Singles Chart number ones of the 1950s
  5. List of UK Singles Chart number ones of the 1960s
  6. List of UK Singles Chart number ones of the 1970s
  7. List of UK Singles Chart number ones of the 1980s
  8. List of UK Singles Chart number ones of the 1990s
  9. List of UK Singles Chart number ones of the 2000s
  10. UK Singles Chart records and statistics
  11. List of artists with the most UK Singles Chart number ones
  12. UK Singles Chart
  13. List of songs that reached number one on the Irish Singles Chart
  14. Irish Singles Chart
  15. Canadian Singles Chart
  16. List of artists who reached number one on the UK Singles Chart
  17. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2006
  18. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2005
  19. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2004
  20. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2002
  21. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2001
  22. List of UK Singles Chart Christmas number twos
  23. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2000
  24. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2007
  25. Lists of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones
  26. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2007
  27. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2008
  28. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2008
  29. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2005
  30. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2006
  31. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of the 1980s
  32. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2002
  33. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2003
  34. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2004
  35. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2000
  36. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2001
  37. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2001
  38. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2002
  39. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2003
  40. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2004
  41. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2005
  42. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2006
  43. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2007
  44. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2008
  45. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2009
  46. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2009
  47. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2009
  48. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2009
  49. List of UK Singles Chart number ones of the 2010s
  50. List of instrumental number ones on the UK Singles Chart
  51. List of Irish Singles Chart Christmas number ones
  52. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2010
  53. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2010
  54. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2010
  55. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2010
  56. List of artists who reached number one on the French Singles Chart
  57. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2011
  58. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2011
  59. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2011
  60. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2011
  61. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2003
  62. Lists of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones
  63. Lists of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones
  64. List of posthumous number ones on the UK Singles Chart
  65. List of songs which have spent the most weeks on the UK Singles Chart
  66. List of artists who reached number one on the Italian Singles Chart
  67. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2012
  68. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2012
  69. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2012
  70. Official Classical Singles Chart
  71. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2012
  72. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2013
  73. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2013
  74. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2013
  75. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2013
  76. Oricon Singles Chart
  77. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 1990
  78. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 1987
  79. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 1988
  80. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 1987
  81. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2000
  82. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2014
  83. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2014
  84. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2014
  85. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2014
  86. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 1999
  87. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 1999
  88. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 1998
  89. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 1997
  90. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2015
  91. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2015
  92. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2015
  93. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2015
  94. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2008
  95. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2007
  96. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2006
  97. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2005
  98. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2016
  99. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2016
  100. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2016
  101. Official Vinyl Singles Chart
  102. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2016
  103. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2004
  104. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2003
  105. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2002
  106. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2001
  107. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2000
  108. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 1999
  109. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 1999
  110. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 1998
  111. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 1997
  112. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 1996
  113. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 1995
  114. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 1994
  115. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 1995
  116. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 1996
  117. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 1997
  118. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 1998
  119. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 1994
  120. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2017
  121. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2017
  122. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2017
  123. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2017
  124. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 1988
  125. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 1986
  126. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 1998
  127. List of artists who reached number one on the Spanish Singles Chart
  128. List of artists with the most UK Singles Chart top tens
  129. List of Official Vinyl Singles Chart number ones of the 2010s
  130. List of artists by number of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones
  131. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2018
  132. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2018
  133. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2018
  134. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2018
  135. List of artists who reached number one on the Danish Singles Chart
  136. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2019
  137. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2019
  138. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2019
  139. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2019
  140. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 1995
  141. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 1996
  142. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 1997
  143. List of UK Singles Chart number ones of the 2020s
  144. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2020
  145. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2020
  146. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2020
  147. List of Official Vinyl Singles Chart number ones of the 2020s
  148. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2020
  149. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 1994
  150. UK Afrobeats Singles Chart
  151. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2021
  152. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2021
  153. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2021
  154. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2021
  155. ARIA Dance Singles Chart
  156. ARIA Urban Singles Chart
  157. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2022
  158. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2022
  159. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2022
  160. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2022
  161. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2023
  162. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2023
  163. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2023
  164. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2023
  165. List of weekly top ten UK Singles Chart singles of the 2020s
  166. List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 2024
  167. List of UK Independent Singles Chart number ones of 2024
  168. List of UK R&B Singles Chart number ones of 2024
  169. List of UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart number ones of 2024
Relisting comment: Relisting for a last chance to generate a clearer consensus. BD2412 T 17:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: given that there were four UK singles charts back in the 1950s and 60s, all considered equally valid, how would we differentiate that this is now considered THE official singles chart of the time, if the proper noun is removed? Richard3120 (talk) 20:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree. That was kind of what I was trying to say: capitalising does add information that this is The Singles Chart as opposed to a singles chart. Removing the capital reduces the information and is potentially misleading. Btljs (talk) 11:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Then that would be capitalisation for emphasis or distinction, which we don't do per MOS:SIGNIFCAPS. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: As part of assessing the consensus of the RM, I'm splitting this into a separate section; it has received minimal discussion and any consensus from the RM would not apply to the additional titles listed here. BilledMammal (talk) 03:44, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:UK_singles_chart&oldid=1246581869"